Essay on Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour - 911 Words

Women should be powerful, beautiful and intelligence. Nevertheless, women in the eighteenth century were portrayed as servants did not have any say in anything just like the story of an hour by Kate Chopin, where even in a good marriage you could not do the things you wanted to do. What if their husbands died what would come of them? How would they feel? And the irony of gaining freedom but losing everything? In the eighteenth century, Women were portrayed as powerless beneath the men because, men were powerful everything was given to them once they became men and wife. According to Hicks, Jennifer â€Å"Divorce was quite rare in the 1800s and if one was to occur, men were automatically given legal control of all property and children†,†¦show more content†¦Literature: A World of Writing â€Å"When she abandoned herself a little whispered word escaped her slightly parted lips. She said it over and over under her breath: free, free, free! The vacant stare and the look of terror that had followed it went from her eyes. They stayed keen and bright. Her pulses beat fast, and the coursing blood warmed and relaxed every inch of her body† this could only mean that she was free from being powerless or maybe she was unhappy with her life and when her husband died she felt a big weight lifted off her shoulders Kathleen, Wilson Said â€Å"Once Mrs. Mallard accepts the feeling , even though she knows that her husband had really loved her, she is ecstatic that she will never have to bend her will to his again. Now that her husband is dead, she will be free to assert herself in ways she never before dreamed while he was alive† Mrs. Mallard then goes on to welcoming this new feeling she would never have to clean up after him never going to worry about if he’s okay or not, never going to only think about him. She then says â€Å"There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon aShow MoreRelatedAn Analysis of Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour1150 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿ Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour is a perfect example of literature that glorifies the commonplace event: the story depicts a gigantic event in the life of its protagonist by using a minimalist economy of means. The opening sentence of The Story of an Hour carefully sets up the conclusion of the story. Chopin is working with such limited space here that it resembles more the crafting of a poem than a fictional narrative. We are told that Mrs Mallard was afflicted with heart trouble so greatRead MoreEssay on Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour537 Words   |  3 Pages In Kate Chopins short story quot;The Story of an Hour,quot; there is much hatred. The first hatred detected is in the way that Louise reacts to the news of the death of her husband, Mr. Mallard. Before Louises reaction is revealed, Chopin turns to how the widow feels by describing the world according to her outlook of it after the bad news. Louise is said to quot;not hear the story as many women have heard the same.quot; Rather, she accepts it and goes to her room to be alone. Now the personRead MoreSymbolism In Kate Chopins The Story Of An Hour1013 Words   |  5 PagesWhile most of Kate Chopin’s short stories were well received, â€Å"The Story of an Hour† was originally rejected by publishers until 1894 when Vogue decided to publish the short story. However after her death most of Chopin’s work was forgotten, that was until the 1950s when her work again was recognized as insightful and moving, setting into motion a Kate Chopin revival which was both successful and remarkable (Biography). â€Å"The Story of an Hour† focuses on the liberation and new found freedom of a newlyRead MoreKate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essay560 Words   |  3 Pages In Kate Chopin’s short story, â€Å"The Story of an Hour†, the author shows us the response of a young woman to her husband’s presumed death. Before the news, the widow, Mrs. Mallard, felt trapped in a situation she found to be inescapable. Her marriage made her feel as though her will wasn’t really her own, that she wasn’t really free. However, when the news of her husband’s death reaches her, she finally begins to feel that she has a chance to be fre e. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; During her mingledRead MoreKate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essay803 Words   |  4 PagesIn Kate Chopin’s â€Å"The Story of an Hour† allows one to explore many ironic instances throughout the story, the main one in which a woman unpredictably feels free after her husband’s assumed death. Chopin uses Mrs. Mallard’s bizarre story to illustrate the struggles of reaching personal freedom and trying to be true to yourself to reach self-assertion while being a part of something else, like a marriage. In â€Å"The Story of an Hour† the main character, Mrs. Mallard, celebrates the death of her husbandRead MoreCriticism In Kate Chopins The Story Of An Hour830 Words   |  4 Pagesintroduction to any other writer with this kind of writing style to verify my assertion of Kate Chopin’s work, nonetheless Chopin does a brilliant job of exhibiting her Creole background in her work coherently. Although many may argue that modern feminism has taken a new meaning compared to its’ early beginnings. Chopin exhibited a hint of feminism through characters like Clarisse and Mrs. Mallard. In The Story of An Hour, Chopin crafted Mrs. Mallards Character as woman who seem to yearn for freedom to theRead MoreKate CHopins Story of an Hour Essay1271 Words   |  6 Pages In Kate Chopins Story of an Hour the author portrays patriarchal oppression in the institution of marriage by telling the story of one fateful hour in the life of a married woman. Analyzing the work through feminist criticism, one can see the implications of masculine discourse. Mrs. Mallards medical diagnosis is an example of the male-dominated society in which she lives. They are able to tell her that she indeed has a heart condition, but are unable to treat her effectivelyRead MoreEssay on Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour655 Words   |  3 PagesKate Chopins The Story of an Hour In â€Å"The Story of an Hour† by Kate Chopin, the author depicts how someone can be trapped in an unproductive and unsatisfying reality because of other’s thoughtlessness, exploitation, and domination. When combined with the contemporary society’s belief, presumably the later half of the 19th century, a further understanding of Chopin’s thoughts and feelings can be realized. Mrs. Louise Mallard, the victim and messenger of this story, is the image of such aRead More Irony in Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essays1295 Words   |  6 PagesIrony in Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour A very dull and boring story can be made into a great story simply by adding in something that is unexpected to happen. When the unexpected is used in literature it is known as irony. An author uses irony to shock the reader by adding a twist to the story. The author of â€Å"The Story of an Hour† is Kate Chopin. Her use of irony in the story is incredibly done more than once. Irony is thinking or believing some event will happen but in return the unexpectedRead MoreThe Story of a Widow in Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essay840 Words   |  4 Pagespersistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature.† Kate Chopin’s â€Å"The Story of an Hour† is the story of a woman’s reaction to the news of her husband’s passing. Mrs. Louise Mallard is a young woman most would conclude to be saddened by the passing of her husband. Yet it is in that very moment we find her true feelings. Kate Chopin was born Katherine O’Flaherty on February 8, 1850 in St. Louis Missouri. She was the only child born to her

How Vacancies in the US Congress are Filled

The methods for filling vacancies in the U.S. Congress vary greatly, and for good reason, between the Senate and the House of Representatives.   When a U.S. representative or senator leave Congress before the end of his or her term, are the people of their congressional district or state left without representation in Washington? Key Takeaways: Vacancies in Congress Vacancies in the U.S. Congress occur when a senator or representative dies, resigns, retires, is expelled, or is elected to another office before the end of their regular term.Most vacancies in the Senate can be filled immediately through an appointment made by the governor to the former senator’s state.Vacancies in the House can take as long as six months to fill, because representatives can only be replaced through a special election. Members of Congress; senators, and representatives, usually leave office before the end of their terms for one of five reasons: death, resignation, retirement, expulsion, and election or appointment to other government posts. Vacancies in the Senate While the U.S. Constitution does not mandate a method by which vacancies in the Senate are to be handled, vacancies can be filled almost immediately through an appointment made by the governor of the former senators state. The laws of some states require the governor to call a special election to replace U.S. senators. In states where replacements are appointed by the governor, the governor almost always appoints a member of his or her own political party. In some cases, the governor will appoint one of the states current U.S. representatives in the House to fill the vacant Senate seat, thus creating a vacancy in the House. Vacancies in Congress also occur when a member runs for and is elected to some other political office before his or her term is over. In 36 states, the governors appoint temporary replacements for vacant Senate seats. At the next regularly scheduled election, a special election is held to replace the temporary appointees, who may run for the office themselves. In the remaining 14 states, a special election is held by a specified date to fill the vacancy. Of those 14 states, 10 allow the governor the option of making an interim appointment to fill the seat until the special election is held.   Since Senate vacancies can be filled so quickly and each state has two senators, it is highly unlikely that a state would ever be without representation in the Senate. The 17th Amendment and Senate Vacancies Until ratification of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1913, vacant seats in the Senate in the same way Senators themselves were chosen — by the states, rather than by the people. As originally ratified, the Constitution specified that Senators were to be appointed by the legislatures of the states rather than elected by the people. Similarly, the original Constitution left the duty of filling vacant Senate seats solely to the state legislatures. The framers felt that granting the states the power to appoint and replace senators would make them more loyal to the federal government and increase the new Constitution’s chances of ratification. However, when repeated lengthy Senate vacancies began to delay the legislative process, the House and Senate finally agreed to send the 17th Amendment requiring the direct election of senators to the states for ratification. The Amendment also established the current method of filling Senate vacancies through special elections. Vacancies in the House Vacancies in the House of Representatives typically take far longer to fill. The Constitution requires that member of the House be replaced only by an election held in the congressional district of the former representative. When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies. -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution According to the U.S. Constitution and state law, the governor of the state calls for a special election to replace the vacant House seat. The full election cycle must be followed including political party nominating processes, primary elections and a general election, all held in the congressional district involved. The entire process often takes as long as from three to six months. While a House seat is vacant, the office of the former representative remains open, its staff operating under the supervision of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. The people of the affected congressional district do not have voting representation in the House during the vacancy period. They can, however, continue to contact former representatives interim office for assistance with a limited range of services as listed below by the Clerk of the House. Legislative Information from Vacant Offices Until a new representative is elected, the vacant congressional office cannot take or advocate positions of public policy. Constituents may choose to express opinions on legislation or issues to your elected Senators or wait until a new representative is elected. Mail received by the vacant office will be acknowledged. The staff of the vacant office can assist constituents with general information concerning the status of legislation, but cannot provide analysis of issues or render opinions. Assistance With Federal Government Agencies The staff of the vacant office will continue to assist constituents who have cases pending with the office. These constituents will receive a letter from the Clerk requesting whether the staff should continue assistance or not. Constituents who do not have pending cases but require assistance in matters relating to federal government agencies are invited to contact the nearest district office for further information and assistance.

Julius Ceasar Free Essays

Brutus gives his thoughts of killing Caesar in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesaract 2 scene 1. In Brutus’s soliloquy he reveals how Caesar â€Å"might change his nature† (4). Brutus also states â€Å"he may do danger† (8). We will write a custom essay sample on Julius Ceasar or any similar topic only for you Order Now What Brutus is referring to is if Caesar gets crowned he might abuse his power. Brutus is an honorable man who is for the people of Rome. Although this might not be his reasoning for killing Caesar. It may be that Brutus himself wants power. Therefore Brutus is willing to do anything necessary to get what he wants. The metaphor Brutus uses in his soliloquy is how Caesar may climb â€Å"young ambitions ladder† (13). Brutus repeats that Caesar is climbing a ladder to get what he wants. To repeat Brutus declares â€Å"whereto the climber-upward turn’s his face but when he once attains the upmost round he then unto the ladder turns his back† (14-16). To be sure Brutus wants to join the conspirators to kill Caesar, Brutus articulates how Caesar will turn his back on the people that he once used to get to the high place he wants to be at, which is the crown. â€Å"So Caesar may† (18). Which means Caesar might do all these bad things. Therefore Brutus thinks of Caesar as a â€Å"serpent’s egg† (23). Thus Brutus thinks it’s necessary to â€Å"kill him in the shell† (25). At the end of Brutus’s soliloquy Brutus has made up his mind to join the conspiracy and kill Caesar. There could be many topics from this quote but the two most important topics are projection and ambition. In this soliloquy Brutus projects how he feels about Caesar. In doing so, Brutus manipulates what Caesar actions to get what he wants. Brutus wants what is best for the people and himself and Brutus thinks that Caesar will do harm to the people if he is crowned. Brutus also suggests that Caesar will change and be a different person. Everything that Brutus projects about Caesar, Brutus is construing to his own fashion. To be correct Brutus states that Caesar is ambitious. Brutus implies that Caesar is striving for the crown. Although Caesar doesn’t show his ambition literally he shows it other ways. Granted that Brutus may also be ambitious, due to the fact that he wants to kill Caesar and join the conspiracy. Brutus says that Caesar is ambitious for power but that might not be the case. It might be that Brutus is more ambitious than Caesar for power. Brutus does not show how ambitious he is for power until the end of his soliloquy. In this soliloquy it shows how ambition can be a negative connotation because desires something. Brutus esires Caesar to die and to make him self seem like honorable man to the people. Although in reality Brutus is just trying to get one of his desires. And Caesars desires were the crown. If Caesar desires the crown then Caesar is in the way of Brutus’s desire. So therefore Brutus needs to think that killing Caesar is the right thing to do for himself. To conclude Brutus must kill Caesar to get what he desires the most. Although Brutus was not only influenced by his desires but the desires of Cassius. By the end of this quote it shows how Cassius projected Brutus’s thoughts of Caesar. Therefore Brutus must kill Caesar. How to cite Julius Ceasar, Papers

Role of Language in Oppressing Aboriginal People

Question: Discuss about the Role of Language in Oppressing Aboriginal People. Answer: Introduction: Australian indigenous tribes had lived with each other harmoniously until the entry of western colonizers (Dodson, 1994). This marked the oppression of Aboriginal people by the missionaries. The Aboriginals rights were never respected, and they had to conform to the demands of the missionaries (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 1997). Among all the Australian indigenous tribes, Aboriginal seemed to suffer more from missionaries oppressions. The missionaries perceived Aboriginal culture as inferior, and therefore they had to be assimilated into white society (Broome, 2010, p. 8). The language used by the missionaries towards the Aboriginal was oppressive in nature(Dudgeon, et al., 2010, p. 28). Just as the rest of the society, missionaries had an attitude that Aboriginals were the inferior race that had no right to live (Dodson, 1994). This perception developed into a language that each missionary directed towards the Aboriginals. The churchs attitude towards Aboriginals is well portrayed in the scenarios where they applied all the means to destroy Aboriginal culture. The church criticisms on the Aboriginals way of life was the language of the day. To perfect their mission, missionaries intentionally tried to get rid of Aboriginal culture through families separation (David Denham, 2006, p. 60). Same as Carol puts it in her story Bringing Them Home the church was on the front line in separating Aboriginal children from their parents with an excuse that they will be educated in a more civilized way. Additionally, the structures in the learning centers did not allow the interaction of Aboriginal people. Alternatively, the missionaries divided Aboriginal clans into several missions to cut off the development of their culture. The missionaries oppression directed towards Aboriginal people was out of the perception that Aboriginal people were of an inferior race. References Broome, R. (2010). Aboriginal Australians A history since 1788 (4th ed.). (Ch. 1 pp. 5-14 Ch. 3 pp. 36- 56). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen Unwin. Available High use collection David, B., Denham. T. (2006). Unpacking Australian pre-history. In B. David, B. Barker I. McNiven (Eds), the Social Archaeology of Australian Indigenous Societies, pp. 52-71. Canberra, Australia: Aboriginal Studies Press. Dudgeon, P. et al., 2010. The Social, Cultural and Historical Context of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians , Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Dodson, M. (1994). The end in the beginning: Re (de)finding Aboriginality. Paper presented at The Wentworth Lecture, the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra, ACT. Retrieved from the Australian Human Rights Commission Website: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/about/media/speeches/social_justice/end_in_the_beginning.ht ml Follow link Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (1997). bringing them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families. Sydney, Australia. Australian Human Rights Commission. Available https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/bringing-them-home-stolen-children-report-1997.