Parallel Arrays free essay sample

A variety of structures are normally identical to resemble varieties of the parts. For instance, if every understudy record comprises of an ID number and a GPA esteem, at that point a rundown of understudies can be spoken to as a variety of structure: similar information can be put away as two exhibits that corresponding to one another, as in a similar file in them demonstrate information for a similar understudy: Usually the primary way is increasingly characteristic and advantageous. Points of interest and inconveniences Against Arrays Compared to clusters, connected information structures permit greater adaptability in arranging the information and in assigning space for it. With clusters, we should pick a size for our exhibit for the last time; this can be an expected misuse of memory. A connected Data structure is constructed powerfully and never should be greater than the developer requires. It likewise requires no speculating as far as how much space you should apportion when utilizing a connected information structure. We will compose a custom exposition test on Equal Arrays or then again any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page This is an element that is Key in sparing squandered memory. The hubs of a connected information structure can likewise be moved separately to various areas without influencing the sensible associations between them, in contrast to clusters. With due consideration, a procedure can add or erase hubs to one piece of an information structure even while different procedures are taking a shot at different parts. Then again, access to a specific hub in a connected information structure requires following a chain of references that put away in it. On the off chance that the structure has n hubs, and every hub contains all things considered b joins, there will be a few hubs that can't be reached in under log b n steps. For some structures, a few hubs may require most pessimistic scenario up to n - 1 stages. Conversely, many exhibit information structures permit access to any component with a steady number of tasks, autonomous of the quantity of passages. General Disadvantages Linked information structures likewise may likewise bring about in generous memory allotment overhead (if hubs are dispensed separately) and disappoint memory paging nd processor storing calculations (since they for the most part have poor region of reference). Now and again, connected information structures may likewise utilize more memory (for the connection fields) than contending cluster structures. This is on the grounds that connected information structures are not adjoining. Occasions of information can be discovered all over in memory, in contrast to exhibits. In some hypothetical models of calculation that uphold the limitations of connected structures, for example, the pointer machine, numerous issues require a larger number of steps than in the unconstrained arbitrary access machine model.

Spanish Verbs That Mean to Ask

Spanish Verbs That Mean to Ask Spanish has a few action words that can be utilized to mean inquire. They are not all exchangeable, and there are some inconspicuous contrasts in importance among some of them. Among those action words: Preguntar is the action word utilized most generally to intend to pose an inquiry or to get some information about something. It is regularly trailed by the relational word por to show the subject of the request: Preguntã ³ por la situaciã ³n lawful de su hermano. He got some information about his siblings legitimate circumstance. Pablo preguntaba por ti. Pablo was inquiring as to yourself. Preguntã © si habã ­a estudiado la lecciã ³n. I inquired as to whether she had examined the exercise. Preguntar is the action word utilized regularly to show just that an individual had posed an inquiry. -  ¿En quã © pgina est à ©l? - preguntã ³ Juana. What page is it on? Juana inquired. Pedir is generally used to demonstrate an immediate solicitation or to request (as opposed to about) something. Like the English action word to ask for, it doesn't need to be trailed by a relational word. Pidiã ³ un coche azul. She requested a blue vehicle. Sã ³lo pedã ­ que repararan el techo. I just requested that they fix the rooftop.  ¿Te pidiã ³ dinero? Did she approach you for cash? Rogar can intend to officially ask or to make a proper solicitation. What's more, contingent upon the unique circumstance, it can likewise mean to ask or to supplicate. Le rogamos que indique los nã ºmeros de telã ©fono completos. We demand that you demonstrate the total phone number. Se ruegan los clientes que tomen las precauciones oportunas para salvaguardar sus pertenencias. Clients are approached to avoid potential risk so as to secure their effects. Te ruego que tengas piedad con mi madre. I beseech you to have feel sorry for on my mom. Fueron a la iglesia para rogar. They went to the congregation to ask. Invitar can be utilized when requesting that somebody accomplish something or head off to some place, much like the English related welcome. Nunca he invitado a nadie a postear en mi blog. I never have requested that anybody post on my blog. Te invito a mi casa. I am asking you to my home. Solicitar can be utilized similarly as pedir, despite the fact that it is less normal and is destined to be utilized with specific sorts of solicitations, for example, for data, or in lawful or business settings. Solicitan amnistã ­a para ex presidente. They are requesting absolution for the previous president. Solicitaron sus opiniones profesionales sobre el proyecto. They are requesting his expert sentiments about the venture.

Money at the Movies Which Avenger Gives Marvel the Most Bang for Its Buck

Money at the Movies Which Avenger Gives Marvel the Most Bang for Its Buck Money at the Movies: Which Avenger Gives Marvel the Most Bang for Its Buck? Money at the Movies: Which Avenger Gives Marvel the Most Bang for Its Buck?Some financial lessons for Marvel Studios as they move into a new phase following Avengers: Infinity War.Over the past ten years, the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) has completely rewritten the rules for how Hollywood makes movies. Heck, remember when the phrase “cinematic universe” wasn’t even a thing?All of that comes to a head this weekend with the release of Avengers: Infinity War, the first of two Avengers team-up movies that will bring the current incarnation of the MCU to a closeâ€"with a pretty big bang.This got us thinking: As the MCU moves into a new phase, what can Marvel Studios learn from their past successes. We took a look at every single superhero in the Avengers that headlined their own film(s), and we tried to figure out which ones made for the most profitable investment.We looked at how much each hero’s movie(s) cost to produce, and how much they grossed worldwide. This way, we can truly find out which hero delivered the most bang for Marvel’s buck, and what lessons Marvel can learn as they move into their post-Infinity War life.We’ve laid out the results below from least profitable to most profitable. Some of the answers were pretty surprising …(All dollar figures via The Numbers)9. The HulkMovies: The Incredible HulkBudget: Hulk: $137 millionBox Office Gross: $265 millionReturn on Investment: 193 percentThe Hulk has had a big come-up in recent years, especially with his scene-stealing turn in Thor: Ragnarok. But the fact remains that the only time The Hulk starred in his own film, it didn’t even make back twice its production budget. He is Marvel’s least profitable Avenger by a country mile.Then again, that movie was only Marvel’s second film after Iron Man, before they had perfected their successful (if formulaic) combination of pithy dialogue, punch-em-up action, and anonymous Atlanta office park locales. Also, The Incredible Hulk starred Edwar d Norton as the titular giant green rage monsterâ€"not Mark Ruffalo, who assumed the character from the first Avengers film onward.Maybe a Mark Ruffalo-starring Hulk film would do gangbusters? Or maybe the big guy only really works when he’s part of a larger ensemble? No one knows for sure, but another Hulk solo film would be a pretty risky bet (or one heck of a heat check) from a studio that wants to keep those money presses rolling.The Lesson. Some characters don’t needâ€"or can’t supportâ€"their own movies. Don’t be afraid to recast when absolutely necessary. Don’t cast Edward Norton in the first place.8. Ant-ManMovies: Ant-ManTotal Budget: $130 millionTotal Box Office Gross: $519 millionReturn on Investment: 396 percentSpeaking of heat checks, people at the time thought that Marvel was crazy for making a film based around this less-than-well-known character, especially once visionary director Edgar Wright, who’d been with the film since the very beginning, departed f rom the project over “creative differences.”Turns out that they needn’t have worried. While Ant-Man didn’t do huge business compared to some of his more well-known teammates, the film still did very well, making almost $520 million worldwide against a $130 million budgetâ€"a return on investment (ROI) of 396 percent!Casting Paul Rudd helped (casting Paul Rudd always helps), as did the film’s breezy, heist movie tone and inventive action sequences. A sequel, Ant-Man and The Wasp, is scheduled for later this summer. And if the trailers are anything to go by, audiences can expect more of the same plus approximately 500 percent more butt-kicking Evangeline Lilly. Sounds like a hit to us!The Lesson: More obscure characters can succeed, just make sure that you cast a ludicrously likable actor and maybe don’t break the bank budget-wise. Giving non-white dudes top billing for new and future movies is a plus.7. Captain AmericaMovies: Captain America: The First Avenger, Captain Am erica: The Winter Soldier, Captain America: Civil WarTotal Budget: $560 millionTotal Box Office Gross: $2.238 billionReturn on Investment: 399 percentOk wow. This is our first big shocker on the list. How could Captain America, one of the two main linchpins of the Avengers franchise, be ranked third to last? People love the Captain America movies! They love Captain America! Or at the very least, they love looking at Chris Evans in form-fitting t-shirts. What gives?!So, a couple things give. First of all: People do love Captain America, which is why these movies have made a ton of money. A $2.238 billion box office for three films is not too shabby! Second of all: these numbers are dragged down slightly by the first Cap movie, which made only (only!) $370 million worldwide relative to its $140 million budget.Lastly, the third Captain America movie, Captain America: Civil War, was basically a stealth Avengers movieâ€"possibly to make up for the relative low point that was Avengers: Ag e of Ultronâ€"and it had the budget to match: $250 million, more than the first Avengers movie cost to make.Still, the fact remains that Captain America, considering how beloved he is, doesn’t have quite the return on investment that some might think. You could even argue that Civil War, the highest-grossing film of the trilogy by far, barely counts as a Captain America movie, given its full roster of heroes.While it might tempting for Marvel to continue the Captain America mantle in its next phase, possibly by having Falcon or Bucky Barnes pick it up from Steve Rogers, they might want to go in another direction. Cap might be all about the red, white, and blue. But he ain’t so much about that greenâ€"at least not as much as previously thought.The Lesson: Don’t feel so much pressure to keep Captain America going past Infinity War. If you screw up a film, don’t be afraid to shoehorn in a stealth re-do.6. ThorMovies: Thor, Thor: Dark World, Thor: RagnarokTotal Budget: $480 mill ionTotal Box Office Gross: $1.943 billionReturn on Investment: 404 percentLook Chris Hemsworth is truly great as Thor. But if you had told us that Thor’s movies were more profitable for Marvel than Captain America’s, we would have thought you were out of your Infinity Stone-addled mind. Because while Hemsworth might be fantastic as Thor, his movies have been, well, something of a mixed bag. It wasn’t until the third movie in the trilogy, Thor: Ragnarok, that Marvel made an honest-to-goodness great film about the Asgardian prince.And yet here we are. So what gives?It’s a couple of things. Thor’s first film did quite a bit better than Cap’s, making almost $80 million more worldwideâ€"though it also cost $10 million more to produce. And while that’s the last time that a Thor movie would outgross a Captain America flick, Thor’s budgets haven’t grown nearly as much either. Thor: Dark World cost $20 million less than Captain America: The Winter Soldier, while Ragnarok co st $70 million less than Civil War.Ragnarok did very well, grossing $850 million worldwide, which feels generally in line with the film’s positive reception. But Dark World? That movie is widely seen as one of the worst Marvel films and yet still grossed well over $640 million. If you want to look for a culprit to explain Thor’s surprise victory over Captain America, look no further.The profitability of Thor really goes to show how Marvel’s big hits can really help carry buoy some of its misses. So much so, in fact, that they don’t end up being misses. They’re just slightly smaller hits!The Lesson: Casting the right actor is super important. So long as you make movies that are pretty good, you’ll make a lot of money. Don’t give up on a franchise too early.5. Doctor StrangeMovies: Doctor StrangeTotal Budget: Doctor Strange: $165 millionTotal Box Office Gross: $677 millionReturn on Investment: 410 percentThe most interesting thing about Doctor Strange’s placement on th is list is what it says about the MCU’s present and it’s future. The film’s massive box office haul can be chalked up, in large part, to the trust that Marvel has built up over the past decade. When the studio launched Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger back in 2011, both films did reasonably well. But now, after so many hitsâ€"and after building an audience that knows they need to see every film to fully grasp the larger pictureâ€"they can launch Doctor Strange and have it gross over four times its original budget.The film also marks an interesting step forward stylistically for the company. Doctor Strange’s trippy, reality-splintering action scenes and trips to the astral plane are unlike anything we’ve seen in other MCU films. And this is a good thing! After years of consistently solid but unimpressive filmmaking, Marvel is now broadening its palate before audiences get bored. Between Doctor Strange, Black Panther, and Thor: Ragnarok, audiences can have three f airly unique experiences within the MCU at large.Anyway, while Marvel hasn’t announced a date for Doctor Strange 2 yet, it seems like a pretty safe bet. Given how heavily the character is being featured in the marketing for Infinity War, we are confident in predicting that he’ll be a majorâ€"and majorly profitableâ€"part of the MCU for years to come.The Lesson: 10 years in, you can get away with things you couldn’t do before. Use that to your advantage. Elements like not-so-famous characters and weird, psychedelic effects aren’t risky anymoreâ€"they’re a welcome change of pace.4. Iron ManMovies: Iron Man, Iron Man 2, Iron Man 3Total Budget: $556 millionTotal Box Office Gross: $2.421 billionReturn on Investment: 435 percentLook. Without Robert Downey Jr. and his instantly iconic performance as billionaire genius playboy Tony Stark, there would be no Marvel Cinematic Universe. Full stop. There would have been two moviesâ€"Iron Man and The Incredible Hulkâ€"after which all of Marvel’s rights would have been sold off to other studios for relative pennies on the dollar. Edward Norton wasn’t getting the job done, we can tell you that much!The only thing that is keeping Iron Man from ranking higher on this list is the relatively blah performance of Iron Man 2. Why didn’t Iron Man 2 perform better, you ask? Because it wasn’t very good! It’s the kind of movie that is fine for a lazy, half-attentive re-watch on a Saturday afternoon, but it was a huge letdown in theatres and only grossed $36 million more than the original.Luckily, all was forgiven by Iron Man 3, which was a massive successâ€"not to mention a much better film. On a $200 million budget, Iron Man 3 grossed over 1.2 billion dollars. It is the second highest-grossing solo Marvel movie, beating out even Captain America: Civil War. What was the first highest-grossing? It hasn’t appeared on this list yet, but we’re pretty sure you can guess what it is.The odds that they make more Iron Man movies is slim, as RDJ is getting a bit long in the tooth to play Tony Starkâ€"and his paychecks are getting a bit long in the number of zeroes they contain. Downey’s combined salary for both Infinity War movies is a whopping $200 million. For reference, the first Iron Man movie cost $186 million total. Downey’s definitely earned it, but the odds of him staying on are indeed slim.The Lesson: You can spend all the money you want on fancy special effects, but it takes a great performance to make a movie successful. Even at $100 million per film, Downey is a steal.3. The Guardians of the GalaxyMovies: Guardians of the Galaxy, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2Total Budget: $370 millionTotal Box Office Gross: $1.634 billionReturn on Investment: 441 percentOkay, so we talked about Ant-Man as a major heat check for Marvel, but the riskiness of that film pales in comparison to the Guardians of the Galaxy. These characters were so obscure that they couldnt even be called a deep cut. They w ere more like a secret song.Thats why the success of the first Guardians of the Galaxy proved once and for all that characters didn’t need to be popular for their movie to succeed. Just by letting audiences know that this was film was a part of the MCU, Marvel could guarantee millions of butts in seats come opening weekend. From there, the only tricky part was making a good movie.Still, lots of studios have failed to follow through on that second part. Luckily, for Marvel, they knew that a Guardians of the Galaxy movie might have to clear a slightly higher bar in order to enjoy widespread success. So they turned to indie filmmaker James Gunn, who turned around and produced a summer popcorn flick that was the perfect combination of brash, funny, rocking, and more than a little weird.The lesson Marvel can draw from Guardians of the Galaxy is to choose filmmakers who will bring a more distinctive voice and style to their individual films. The consistency of the early MCU movies have helped set a baseline for audience expectations, but Guardians was one the first movies that felt a little bit different. And it turns out that audiences like different! Or at least, they do after they’ve watched a bunch of movies that feel kind of the same. Without James Gunn and the work he did on Guardians, who knows where the MCU would be.The Lesson: Don’t be afraid to let unique voices shine. Famous characters are overrated. Even super obscure titles can be turned into massively successful franchises.2. Spider-ManMovies: Spider-Man: HomecomingTotal Budget: $175 millionTotal Box Office Gross:  $880 millionReturn on Investment: 502 percentConsidering that he is the best-selling star in Marvel Comics history and has a proven record of box office success. it’s not surprising that Spider-Man ranks so high on this list. But that doesn’t mean that Spidey did all the work himself. This 2017 film marked the 6th Spider-Man movie in 15 yearsâ€"so why did it feel so fresh?Once aga in, Marvel cast the role of Peter Parker perfectly. Not only does Tom Holland have charm, acting chops, and comedic timing to spare, but he was also only 21 when he filmed Spider-Man: Homecoming. For comparison: Tobey Maguire was 26 when he played the high school-aged web slinger, while Andrew Garfield was 28. Maybe, just maybe, casting someone who can actually pass as teenager is important to portraying a character who is, wait for this, a teenager.Furthermore, let’s not sleep on Marvel introducing Peter Parker in Civil War, which meant skipping over his origin story. Next to Batman, no superhero has had their tragic origins rehashed as many times as poor Peter Parker. We get it. Uncle Ben was, like, pretty great. By introducing Peter in Civil War, Marvel set up Homecoming for success. It was an entirely new story, not the same old retread audiences had come to expect.A Spider-Man: Homecoming sequel is already confirmed for 2019. Marvel knows what’s up.The Lesson: Origin storie s are overrated, especially for more famous characters. Spider-Man is good, Tom Holland as Spider-Man is better. A good villain (shouts to Michael Keaton) goes a long way.1. Black PantherMovies: Black PantherTotal Budget: $200 millionTotal Box Office Gross: $1.323 billionReturn on Investment: 650 percentCould it ever have been anyone else? With only one movie under his belt (plus his introduction in Civil War), King T’Challa of Wakanda has already made over $1.3 billion dollars at the box office. Even with a much larger budget ($200 million) than most Marvel get for their first movie, that still gives Black Panther a profit margin of 650 percent. Holy wow.Black Panther is not only a great filmâ€"quite possibly Marvel’s bestâ€"but it also came at the perfect time. After 10 years of headlining heroes who were all white dudes, audiences were clamoring for something different. The fact that director Ryan Coogler delivered a stone-cold classic took a film that was likely to succeed a nd sent it to the stratosphereâ€"and buried any and all ideas that movies with non-white leads wouldn’t perform as well overseas.When everybody goes and sees a movie, that translates to a lot of money. When everybody goes and sees a movie and then goes back and sees it again (and again and again), that translates to a “Scrooge McDuck’s gold-filled swimming pool” amounts of money. One way Marvel can make more of the latter is to continue hiring great filmmakers and then getting out of their way.Marvel has famously controlled a large part of the filmmaking process, which is why TV vets like Joss Whedon and the Russo brothers (who are helming Infinity War) proved such great fits for their systemâ€"though even Whedon crashed out after disagreements during Age of Ultron. But with Coogler, Marvel gave him a great deal more leeway to make the film his own way. And the result was a movie that felt both epic and deeply personal.Black Panther sets a bar for success that pretty much an y other Marvel superhero will have trouble clearing. You know what could do it though? That’s right. Black Panther 2.The Lesson: Don’t only make movies starring white dudes. Trust talented filmmakers to bring it home. Make more Black Panther movies.For the past 10 years, the MCU has been Hollywood’s standard-bearer for financial and franchise-based success. They’ve done so by being consistent and conservative, but by taking small, calculated risks when they needed too and by always trying to stay one step ahead. Those are lessons we could all use.Enjoy Avengers: Infinity War!If you liked this post, check out these related posts and articles from OppLoans:Money at the Movies: Does Box Office Gold Mean a Best Picture Win?How Much Would it Cost to Travel to Every Star Wars Filming Location?What did Life Cost in Hawkins, Indiana in 1983 vs Today?Whos your favorite Marvel hero?  We want to hear from you!  You can  email us  or you can find us on  Facebook  and  Twitter.

Essay on Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour - 911 Words

Women should be powerful, beautiful and intelligence. Nevertheless, women in the eighteenth century were portrayed as servants did not have any say in anything just like the story of an hour by Kate Chopin, where even in a good marriage you could not do the things you wanted to do. What if their husbands died what would come of them? How would they feel? And the irony of gaining freedom but losing everything? In the eighteenth century, Women were portrayed as powerless beneath the men because, men were powerful everything was given to them once they became men and wife. According to Hicks, Jennifer â€Å"Divorce was quite rare in the 1800s and if one was to occur, men were automatically given legal control of all property and children†,†¦show more content†¦Literature: A World of Writing â€Å"When she abandoned herself a little whispered word escaped her slightly parted lips. She said it over and over under her breath: free, free, free! The vacant stare and the look of terror that had followed it went from her eyes. They stayed keen and bright. Her pulses beat fast, and the coursing blood warmed and relaxed every inch of her body† this could only mean that she was free from being powerless or maybe she was unhappy with her life and when her husband died she felt a big weight lifted off her shoulders Kathleen, Wilson Said â€Å"Once Mrs. Mallard accepts the feeling , even though she knows that her husband had really loved her, she is ecstatic that she will never have to bend her will to his again. Now that her husband is dead, she will be free to assert herself in ways she never before dreamed while he was alive† Mrs. Mallard then goes on to welcoming this new feeling she would never have to clean up after him never going to worry about if he’s okay or not, never going to only think about him. She then says â€Å"There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon aShow MoreRelatedAn Analysis of Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour1150 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿ Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour is a perfect example of literature that glorifies the commonplace event: the story depicts a gigantic event in the life of its protagonist by using a minimalist economy of means. The opening sentence of The Story of an Hour carefully sets up the conclusion of the story. Chopin is working with such limited space here that it resembles more the crafting of a poem than a fictional narrative. We are told that Mrs Mallard was afflicted with heart trouble so greatRead MoreEssay on Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour537 Words   |  3 Pages In Kate Chopins short story quot;The Story of an Hour,quot; there is much hatred. The first hatred detected is in the way that Louise reacts to the news of the death of her husband, Mr. Mallard. Before Louises reaction is revealed, Chopin turns to how the widow feels by describing the world according to her outlook of it after the bad news. Louise is said to quot;not hear the story as many women have heard the same.quot; Rather, she accepts it and goes to her room to be alone. Now the personRead MoreSymbolism In Kate Chopins The Story Of An Hour1013 Words   |  5 PagesWhile most of Kate Chopin’s short stories were well received, â€Å"The Story of an Hour† was originally rejected by publishers until 1894 when Vogue decided to publish the short story. However after her death most of Chopin’s work was forgotten, that was until the 1950s when her work again was recognized as insightful and moving, setting into motion a Kate Chopin revival which was both successful and remarkable (Biography). â€Å"The Story of an Hour† focuses on the liberation and new found freedom of a newlyRead MoreKate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essay560 Words   |  3 Pages In Kate Chopin’s short story, â€Å"The Story of an Hour†, the author shows us the response of a young woman to her husband’s presumed death. Before the news, the widow, Mrs. Mallard, felt trapped in a situation she found to be inescapable. Her marriage made her feel as though her will wasn’t really her own, that she wasn’t really free. However, when the news of her husband’s death reaches her, she finally begins to feel that she has a chance to be fre e. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; During her mingledRead MoreKate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essay803 Words   |  4 PagesIn Kate Chopin’s â€Å"The Story of an Hour† allows one to explore many ironic instances throughout the story, the main one in which a woman unpredictably feels free after her husband’s assumed death. Chopin uses Mrs. Mallard’s bizarre story to illustrate the struggles of reaching personal freedom and trying to be true to yourself to reach self-assertion while being a part of something else, like a marriage. In â€Å"The Story of an Hour† the main character, Mrs. Mallard, celebrates the death of her husbandRead MoreCriticism In Kate Chopins The Story Of An Hour830 Words   |  4 Pagesintroduction to any other writer with this kind of writing style to verify my assertion of Kate Chopin’s work, nonetheless Chopin does a brilliant job of exhibiting her Creole background in her work coherently. Although many may argue that modern feminism has taken a new meaning compared to its’ early beginnings. Chopin exhibited a hint of feminism through characters like Clarisse and Mrs. Mallard. In The Story of An Hour, Chopin crafted Mrs. Mallards Character as woman who seem to yearn for freedom to theRead MoreKate CHopins Story of an Hour Essay1271 Words   |  6 Pages In Kate Chopins Story of an Hour the author portrays patriarchal oppression in the institution of marriage by telling the story of one fateful hour in the life of a married woman. Analyzing the work through feminist criticism, one can see the implications of masculine discourse. Mrs. Mallards medical diagnosis is an example of the male-dominated society in which she lives. They are able to tell her that she indeed has a heart condition, but are unable to treat her effectivelyRead MoreEssay on Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour655 Words   |  3 PagesKate Chopins The Story of an Hour In â€Å"The Story of an Hour† by Kate Chopin, the author depicts how someone can be trapped in an unproductive and unsatisfying reality because of other’s thoughtlessness, exploitation, and domination. When combined with the contemporary society’s belief, presumably the later half of the 19th century, a further understanding of Chopin’s thoughts and feelings can be realized. Mrs. Louise Mallard, the victim and messenger of this story, is the image of such aRead More Irony in Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essays1295 Words   |  6 PagesIrony in Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour A very dull and boring story can be made into a great story simply by adding in something that is unexpected to happen. When the unexpected is used in literature it is known as irony. An author uses irony to shock the reader by adding a twist to the story. The author of â€Å"The Story of an Hour† is Kate Chopin. Her use of irony in the story is incredibly done more than once. Irony is thinking or believing some event will happen but in return the unexpectedRead MoreThe Story of a Widow in Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour Essay840 Words   |  4 Pagespersistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature.† Kate Chopin’s â€Å"The Story of an Hour† is the story of a woman’s reaction to the news of her husband’s passing. Mrs. Louise Mallard is a young woman most would conclude to be saddened by the passing of her husband. Yet it is in that very moment we find her true feelings. Kate Chopin was born Katherine O’Flaherty on February 8, 1850 in St. Louis Missouri. She was the only child born to her

How Vacancies in the US Congress are Filled

The methods for filling vacancies in the U.S. Congress vary greatly, and for good reason, between the Senate and the House of Representatives.   When a U.S. representative or senator leave Congress before the end of his or her term, are the people of their congressional district or state left without representation in Washington? Key Takeaways: Vacancies in Congress Vacancies in the U.S. Congress occur when a senator or representative dies, resigns, retires, is expelled, or is elected to another office before the end of their regular term.Most vacancies in the Senate can be filled immediately through an appointment made by the governor to the former senator’s state.Vacancies in the House can take as long as six months to fill, because representatives can only be replaced through a special election. Members of Congress; senators, and representatives, usually leave office before the end of their terms for one of five reasons: death, resignation, retirement, expulsion, and election or appointment to other government posts. Vacancies in the Senate While the U.S. Constitution does not mandate a method by which vacancies in the Senate are to be handled, vacancies can be filled almost immediately through an appointment made by the governor of the former senators state. The laws of some states require the governor to call a special election to replace U.S. senators. In states where replacements are appointed by the governor, the governor almost always appoints a member of his or her own political party. In some cases, the governor will appoint one of the states current U.S. representatives in the House to fill the vacant Senate seat, thus creating a vacancy in the House. Vacancies in Congress also occur when a member runs for and is elected to some other political office before his or her term is over. In 36 states, the governors appoint temporary replacements for vacant Senate seats. At the next regularly scheduled election, a special election is held to replace the temporary appointees, who may run for the office themselves. In the remaining 14 states, a special election is held by a specified date to fill the vacancy. Of those 14 states, 10 allow the governor the option of making an interim appointment to fill the seat until the special election is held.   Since Senate vacancies can be filled so quickly and each state has two senators, it is highly unlikely that a state would ever be without representation in the Senate. The 17th Amendment and Senate Vacancies Until ratification of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1913, vacant seats in the Senate in the same way Senators themselves were chosen — by the states, rather than by the people. As originally ratified, the Constitution specified that Senators were to be appointed by the legislatures of the states rather than elected by the people. Similarly, the original Constitution left the duty of filling vacant Senate seats solely to the state legislatures. The framers felt that granting the states the power to appoint and replace senators would make them more loyal to the federal government and increase the new Constitution’s chances of ratification. However, when repeated lengthy Senate vacancies began to delay the legislative process, the House and Senate finally agreed to send the 17th Amendment requiring the direct election of senators to the states for ratification. The Amendment also established the current method of filling Senate vacancies through special elections. Vacancies in the House Vacancies in the House of Representatives typically take far longer to fill. The Constitution requires that member of the House be replaced only by an election held in the congressional district of the former representative. When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies. -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution According to the U.S. Constitution and state law, the governor of the state calls for a special election to replace the vacant House seat. The full election cycle must be followed including political party nominating processes, primary elections and a general election, all held in the congressional district involved. The entire process often takes as long as from three to six months. While a House seat is vacant, the office of the former representative remains open, its staff operating under the supervision of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. The people of the affected congressional district do not have voting representation in the House during the vacancy period. They can, however, continue to contact former representatives interim office for assistance with a limited range of services as listed below by the Clerk of the House. Legislative Information from Vacant Offices Until a new representative is elected, the vacant congressional office cannot take or advocate positions of public policy. Constituents may choose to express opinions on legislation or issues to your elected Senators or wait until a new representative is elected. Mail received by the vacant office will be acknowledged. The staff of the vacant office can assist constituents with general information concerning the status of legislation, but cannot provide analysis of issues or render opinions. Assistance With Federal Government Agencies The staff of the vacant office will continue to assist constituents who have cases pending with the office. These constituents will receive a letter from the Clerk requesting whether the staff should continue assistance or not. Constituents who do not have pending cases but require assistance in matters relating to federal government agencies are invited to contact the nearest district office for further information and assistance.

Julius Ceasar Free Essays

Brutus gives his thoughts of killing Caesar in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesaract 2 scene 1. In Brutus’s soliloquy he reveals how Caesar â€Å"might change his nature† (4). Brutus also states â€Å"he may do danger† (8). We will write a custom essay sample on Julius Ceasar or any similar topic only for you Order Now What Brutus is referring to is if Caesar gets crowned he might abuse his power. Brutus is an honorable man who is for the people of Rome. Although this might not be his reasoning for killing Caesar. It may be that Brutus himself wants power. Therefore Brutus is willing to do anything necessary to get what he wants. The metaphor Brutus uses in his soliloquy is how Caesar may climb â€Å"young ambitions ladder† (13). Brutus repeats that Caesar is climbing a ladder to get what he wants. To repeat Brutus declares â€Å"whereto the climber-upward turn’s his face but when he once attains the upmost round he then unto the ladder turns his back† (14-16). To be sure Brutus wants to join the conspirators to kill Caesar, Brutus articulates how Caesar will turn his back on the people that he once used to get to the high place he wants to be at, which is the crown. â€Å"So Caesar may† (18). Which means Caesar might do all these bad things. Therefore Brutus thinks of Caesar as a â€Å"serpent’s egg† (23). Thus Brutus thinks it’s necessary to â€Å"kill him in the shell† (25). At the end of Brutus’s soliloquy Brutus has made up his mind to join the conspiracy and kill Caesar. There could be many topics from this quote but the two most important topics are projection and ambition. In this soliloquy Brutus projects how he feels about Caesar. In doing so, Brutus manipulates what Caesar actions to get what he wants. Brutus wants what is best for the people and himself and Brutus thinks that Caesar will do harm to the people if he is crowned. Brutus also suggests that Caesar will change and be a different person. Everything that Brutus projects about Caesar, Brutus is construing to his own fashion. To be correct Brutus states that Caesar is ambitious. Brutus implies that Caesar is striving for the crown. Although Caesar doesn’t show his ambition literally he shows it other ways. Granted that Brutus may also be ambitious, due to the fact that he wants to kill Caesar and join the conspiracy. Brutus says that Caesar is ambitious for power but that might not be the case. It might be that Brutus is more ambitious than Caesar for power. Brutus does not show how ambitious he is for power until the end of his soliloquy. In this soliloquy it shows how ambition can be a negative connotation because desires something. Brutus esires Caesar to die and to make him self seem like honorable man to the people. Although in reality Brutus is just trying to get one of his desires. And Caesars desires were the crown. If Caesar desires the crown then Caesar is in the way of Brutus’s desire. So therefore Brutus needs to think that killing Caesar is the right thing to do for himself. To conclude Brutus must kill Caesar to get what he desires the most. Although Brutus was not only influenced by his desires but the desires of Cassius. By the end of this quote it shows how Cassius projected Brutus’s thoughts of Caesar. Therefore Brutus must kill Caesar. How to cite Julius Ceasar, Papers

Role of Language in Oppressing Aboriginal People

Question: Discuss about the Role of Language in Oppressing Aboriginal People. Answer: Introduction: Australian indigenous tribes had lived with each other harmoniously until the entry of western colonizers (Dodson, 1994). This marked the oppression of Aboriginal people by the missionaries. The Aboriginals rights were never respected, and they had to conform to the demands of the missionaries (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 1997). Among all the Australian indigenous tribes, Aboriginal seemed to suffer more from missionaries oppressions. The missionaries perceived Aboriginal culture as inferior, and therefore they had to be assimilated into white society (Broome, 2010, p. 8). The language used by the missionaries towards the Aboriginal was oppressive in nature(Dudgeon, et al., 2010, p. 28). Just as the rest of the society, missionaries had an attitude that Aboriginals were the inferior race that had no right to live (Dodson, 1994). This perception developed into a language that each missionary directed towards the Aboriginals. The churchs attitude towards Aboriginals is well portrayed in the scenarios where they applied all the means to destroy Aboriginal culture. The church criticisms on the Aboriginals way of life was the language of the day. To perfect their mission, missionaries intentionally tried to get rid of Aboriginal culture through families separation (David Denham, 2006, p. 60). Same as Carol puts it in her story Bringing Them Home the church was on the front line in separating Aboriginal children from their parents with an excuse that they will be educated in a more civilized way. Additionally, the structures in the learning centers did not allow the interaction of Aboriginal people. Alternatively, the missionaries divided Aboriginal clans into several missions to cut off the development of their culture. The missionaries oppression directed towards Aboriginal people was out of the perception that Aboriginal people were of an inferior race. References Broome, R. (2010). Aboriginal Australians A history since 1788 (4th ed.). (Ch. 1 pp. 5-14 Ch. 3 pp. 36- 56). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen Unwin. Available High use collection David, B., Denham. T. (2006). Unpacking Australian pre-history. In B. David, B. Barker I. McNiven (Eds), the Social Archaeology of Australian Indigenous Societies, pp. 52-71. Canberra, Australia: Aboriginal Studies Press. Dudgeon, P. et al., 2010. The Social, Cultural and Historical Context of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians , Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Dodson, M. (1994). The end in the beginning: Re (de)finding Aboriginality. Paper presented at The Wentworth Lecture, the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra, ACT. Retrieved from the Australian Human Rights Commission Website: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/about/media/speeches/social_justice/end_in_the_beginning.ht ml Follow link Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (1997). bringing them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families. Sydney, Australia. Australian Human Rights Commission. Available https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/bringing-them-home-stolen-children-report-1997.